Concerto completo de Cesária Évora em 2004

 

 

Advertisements

Time USA, January, 30-2017

time-usa-january-30-2017

Time USA – January, 30th -2017

BACK IN TIME
Though not every Inauguration has merited a cover story, TIME has been covering the White House for nearly a century including the quadrennial ritual of the President’s promise to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution. Here, editions featuring John  Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama.

 

LIFE AT 1600

The Jan. 23 cover story examining life in the White House which included advice from Obama Administration staffers to their incoming counterparts was “informative, entertaining and inspiring,” wrote John Chomiczewski of Collingswood, N.J.

Jenna Bush Hager and Barbara Bush’s open letter to Malia and Sasha Obama struck a particular chord, prompting NBC anchor Savannah Guthrie to describe the two as “women of goodness and grace” and former Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson to note that we need “more civility like this.”

Their “words of wisdom,” wrote Vogue.com’s Madeleine Luckel, “would serve people at  any stage of life well.”

PERILS OF THE PODIUM

David Von Drehle’s Jan. 23 story on Meryl Streep’s anti-Trump speech at the Golden  Globes drew heated reactions. Sue Mattingly of Meriden, Conn., “appreciated” his idea that artists are most powerful when they stick to art, agreeing that the actor’s “strongest words have come through her acting.” The Rev. Valerie Ann Fons of Washington Island, Wis., however, argued that the speech was a reminder that Streep’s lifetime achievements involve not just acting but also “the courage and voice of real life.” Chicago’s Therese Hoesli was “surprised” by what she read as “vitriol” toward Streep but thought the star could do more.

“If Meryl Streep is so passionate about making ives better for others,” she wrote, “maybe she could demand that half of the cast of her next movie be African-American.”

 

The Economist Europe, January 21-27 2017

The Economist, Europe – January-21-27-2017

the-economist-europe-january-21-27-2017

The 45th president
What is Donald Trump likelyto achieve in power?

 

MUCH of the time, argues David Runciman, a British academic, politics matters little to most people. Then, suddenly, it matters all too much. Donald Trump’s term as America’s 45th president, which is due to begin with the inauguration on January 20th, stands to be one of those moments.

It is extraordinaryhowlittle American votersand the world at large feel they know about what Mr Trump intends. Those who back him are awaiting the biggest shake-up in Washington, DC, in half a century—though their optimism is an act of faith. Those who oppose him are convinced there will be chaos and ruin on an epoch-changing scale—though their despair is guesswork. All that just about everyone can agree on is that Mr Trump promises to be an entirely new sort of American president. The question is, what sort?

Inside the WestWig
You may be tempted to conclude that it is simply too soon to tell. But there is enough information—from the campaign, the months since his victory and his life as a property developer and entertainer—to take a view of what kind of person Mr Trump is and howhe means to fill the office first occupied by George Washington. There is also evidence from the team he has picked, which includes a mix of wealthy businessmen, generals and Republican activists (see pages 14-18).

For sure, Mr Trump is changeable. He will tell the NewYork Times that climate change is man-made in one breath and promise coal country that he will reopen its mines in the next. But that does not mean, as some suggest, that you must always shut outwhat the president says and wait to see what he does. When a president speaks, no easy distinction  is to be made between word and deed. When Mr Trump says that NATO is obsolete, as he did to two European journalists last week, he makes its obsolescence more likely, even if he takes no action.

Moreover, Mr Trump has long held certain beliefs and attitudes that sketch out the lines of a possible presidency. They suggest that the almost boundless Trumpian optimism on display among American businesspeople deserves to be tempered by fears about trade protection and geopolitics, as well asquestions abouthowMrTrump will run his administration.

Start with the optimism. Since November’s election the S&P500 index is up by 6%, to reach record highs. Surveys show thatbusiness confidence has soared. Both reflecthopes that Mr Trump will cut corporate taxes, leadingcompanies to bring foreign profits back home. A boom in domestic spending should follow which, combined with investment in infrastructure and a programme of deregulation, will lift the economy and boostwages.

Done well, tax reform would confer lasting benefits (see Free exchange), aswould a thoughtful and carefully designed programme of infrastructure investment and deregulation. But ifsuch programmesare poorlyexecuted, there is the riskof a sugar-rush as capital chases opportunities that do little to enhance the productive potential of the  economy. That is not the only danger. If prices start to rise faster, pressure will mount on the Federal Reserve to increase interest rates. The dollar will soar and countries that have amassed large dollar debts, many of them emergingmarkets, may well buckle. One  wayoranother, anyresultinginstability will blow back into America. If the Trump administration reacts to widening trade deficits with extra tariffs and non-tariff barriers, then the instability will only be exacerbated. Should Mr Trump right from the start set out to engage foreign exporters from countries such as China, Germany and Mexico in a  conflict over trade, he would do grave harm to the global regime that America itself  created after the second world war.

Just as Mr Trump underestimates the fragility of the global economic system, so too does he misread geopolitics. Even before taking office, Mr Trump has hacked away at the decadesold, largelybipartisan cloth ofAmerican foreign policy. He has casually disparaged the value of the European Union, which his predecessors always nurtured as a source of stability. He has compared Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor and the closest of allies, unfavourably to VladimirPutin, Russia’s president and an old foe. He has savaged Mexico, whose prosperity and goodwill matter greatlyto America’ssouthern states. And, most recklessly, he has begun to pull apart America’s carefully stitched dealings with the rising superpower, China—imperilling the most important bilateral relationship of all.

The idea running through Mr Trump’s diplomacy is that relationsbetween states followthe art ofthe deal. Mr Trump acts as if he can getwhat he wants from sovereign states by  picking fights that he is then willing to settle—at a price, naturally. His mistake is to think that countries are like businesses. In fact, America cannot walk away from China in search of another superpower to deal with over the South China Sea. Doubts that have been sown cannot be uprooted, as if the game had all along been a harmless exercise in price discovery. Alliances that take decades to build can be weakened in months.

Dealings between sovereign states tend towards anarchy because, ultimately, there is no global government to impose order and no means of coercion but war. For as long as Mr Trump is unravelling the order that America created, and from which it gains so much, he is getting his country a terrible deal. HairForce One So troubling is this prospect that it raises one further question. How will Mr Trump’s White House work? On the one hand you have party stalwarts, including the vice-president, Mike Pence; the chief of staff, Reince Priebus; and congressional Republicans, led by Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell. On the other are the agitators—particularly Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro and Michael Flynn. The titanic struggle between normal politics and insurgency, mediated byMrTrump’sdaughter, Ivanka, and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, will determine justhow revolutionary this presidency is.

trump-cabinet

As Mr Trump assumes power, the world is on edge. From the Oval Office, presidents can do a modest amount of good. Sadly, they can also do immense harm.